ONCE
THERE WERE TWO MEN who entered the monkhood at the same time but who followed
different aspirations. One studied the sacred doctrines until he attained such
a proficiency in them that quite a number of admiring students gathered around
him to hear him teach. The other practised very hard and eventually became an
arahat with great spiritual insights.
One
day, the two bhikkhus happened to meet each other for they had gone to see the
Buddha at the same time. The proud master of the sacred texts, however, had no
idea that the monk he just met was already one of high spiritual attainments.
Treating him with disdain, as he did most monks, the scholar wanted to
embarrass the arahat in front of everyone by asking him questions from the
texts which he was sure the arahat would not be able to answer. What the
scholar did not know, however, was that whoever brought harm in any form upon
an arahat would end up being reborn in a lower world.
To
prevent that from happening, the Buddha decided to choose and ask the questions
himself. He put questions concerning the higher states of meditation to the
scholar monk who, of course, could not answer them because he had not practised
what he had recited and preached. On the other hand, the second bhikkhu had no
problem with the questions, answering them humbly but yet with evident authority.
When the questioning session was over, the Buddha praised the arahat
generously, but made no mention of the learned scholar.
The
other bhikkhus wondered why the Buddha praised the arahat and not the
illustrous teacher. The Buddha explained to them that although the first
bhikkhu was well versed in and knowledgeable of the sacred scriptures, he did
not live in accordance with the Dhamma. The Buddha compared him to a cow-herd
who tended somebody else's cows only to earn money and so did not get to drink
any of the cows' milk, while the one who practised the Dhamma was like the
owner who enjoyed not only his cows' milk but all the dairy products that could
be made from it as well.
Similarly,
the scholar monk only enjoyed whatever services his pupils afforded him but not
the benefits of sainthood. On the other hand, though the arahat could barely
recite anything from the sacred scriptures, through his diligent practise he
had come to understand the essence of the Dhamma and so no longer harbored any
greed, hatred, or delusion in his mind. He thus truly reaped the benefits of
sainthood.
Morale of The Story
"Though a person
recites much of the sacred texts, but is negligent and does not practise
according to the Dhamma, he cannot share the blessings of the holy life, just
as a cowherd, counting other people's cows, cannot taste the milk that comes
from them." {Verse 19}
"Though a person
recites only a little of the sacred texts, but practises according to the
Dhamma and becomes truly wise, thus forsaking lust, hatred, and delusion, and
no longer clinging to anything of this or any other world, he indeed shares the
benefits of the holy life." {Verse
20}
No comments:
Post a Comment